Understanding the 17 Competencies
The 17 competencies are the framework used by the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) to assess instructional ability during the ADI Part 3 test and Standards Check.
They are grouped into three areas: Lesson Planning, Risk Management, and Teaching & Learning Strategies. Each competency is scored from 0 to 3, giving a maximum possible score of 51.
Understanding the competencies means understanding what each one is assessing and how the framework fits together. It does not mean learning 17 separate techniques or following a prescribed way of teaching.
At a glance
- There are 17 competencies across three areas: Lesson Planning, Risk Management, and Teaching & Learning Strategies.
- Each competency is scored from 0 to 3.
- A competency contains several elements, so the score reflects the evidence demonstrated across those elements.
- The same 17 competencies are used during ADI Part 3 tests and Standards Checks.
- The competencies are connected. Evidence from one part of a lesson can be relevant to several competencies.
- They are an assessment framework, not a teaching method.
- Understanding what the competencies mean is different from learning how to develop the instructional skills behind them.
What are the 17 competencies?
DVSA uses the 17 competencies to assess different aspects of an instructor's performance during an observed driving lesson.
Four relate to Lesson Planning, five to Risk Management, and eight to Teaching & Learning Strategies.
Although they appear separately on the assessment, they should not be viewed as 17 unrelated boxes. What happens in one part of a lesson can affect several areas of the assessment.
For example, understanding a pupil's needs influences whether the lesson structure is appropriate. The lesson structure affects whether the route or practice area is suitable. Changes in the pupil's performance may then affect whether the original plan remains appropriate.
The competencies give the examiner a structured way of assessing what they observe.
The competency headings below reproduce the official DVSA wording. The explanations underneath are provided to help explain what each competency is assessing.
Lesson Planning
Lesson Planning is concerned with whether the lesson reflects the pupil who is actually in the car, what they need to develop and what happens as the lesson progresses.
1. Did the trainer identify the pupil's learning goals and needs?
This considers whether there is a meaningful understanding of what the pupil needs from the lesson. Learning goals and needs are not necessarily established through one conversation at the beginning. With an existing pupil, much may already be known from previous lessons. New information can also emerge as the lesson develops. The important distinction is between having a genuine understanding of the pupil and simply assuming what they need.
2. Was the agreed lesson structure appropriate for the pupil's experience and ability?
This looks at whether the structure of the lesson makes sense for that particular pupil. An appropriate lesson should reflect their existing experience, current ability and agreed learning goals. Something that is suitable for one pupil may be too demanding, too simple or irrelevant for another. The competency therefore considers the relationship between the pupil's needs and the lesson that has been agreed.
3. Were the practice areas suitable?
This considers whether the environment or route provides appropriate opportunities for the intended learning. A suitable practice area needs to relate to the lesson goals while also being appropriate for the pupil's current capability. An area can be too demanding, but it can also offer too little opportunity for meaningful development. The competency is about the suitability of the environment for the learning taking place, rather than the difficulty of the route by itself.
4. Was the lesson plan adapted, when appropriate, to help the pupil work towards their learning goals?
A lesson plan is not expected to remain unchanged simply because it was agreed at the beginning. The pupil may demonstrate more or less ability than expected, a different need may emerge, the chosen approach may not be helping, or circumstances may change. This competency considers whether the lesson remains relevant as new information becomes available. Adapting a plan without a reason is not automatically positive, just as continuing with the original plan is not automatically correct.
Risk Management
Risk Management covers both the immediate safety of the lesson and the pupil's developing understanding of responsibility and risk.
DVSA makes an important distinction here. The instructor retains responsibility for managing safety during the training session, while also helping the pupil develop their own ability to recognise and manage risk.
5. Did the trainer ensure that the pupil fully understood how the responsibility for risk would be shared?
The balance of responsibility between instructor and pupil is not fixed. A new learner who needs considerable support presents a different situation from an experienced pupil who can manage most situations independently. That balance may also change during the same lesson. This competency considers whether there is sufficient shared understanding of those responsibilities, including what support or intervention the pupil can expect.
6. Were directions and instructions given to the pupil clear and given in good time?
Directions and instructions need to give the pupil enough information and time to respond safely. This is broader than route directions. It includes instructional input given while the pupil is driving. The competency considers whether that input is clear, appropriately timed and suitable for the pupil, rather than confusing, late or excessive.
7. Was the trainer aware of the surroundings and the pupil's actions?
An instructor needs awareness of both the road environment and what the pupil is doing. That includes observing the pupil's actions and responses while continuing to understand what is developing outside the vehicle. This competency is fundamental to risk management because an instructor cannot make appropriate decisions about support or intervention without sufficient awareness of the situation.
8. Was any verbal or physical intervention by the trainer timely and appropriate?
Intervention can range from verbal support to physical action where necessary. The important words are timely and appropriate. Intervening too late can allow risk to develop. Intervening unnecessarily can prevent a pupil from dealing with a situation they were capable of managing themselves. This competency therefore considers the instructor's judgement about whether intervention was required and whether the response suited the situation.
9. Was sufficient feedback given to help the pupil understand any potential safety critical incidents?
If a safety-critical or potentially safety-critical situation occurs, simply preventing the immediate danger does not necessarily mean the learning from it has been completed. This competency considers whether the pupil develops sufficient understanding of what happened and the risk involved. It is specifically concerned with feedback relating to potential safety critical incidents, rather than general feedback throughout the lesson.
Teaching & Learning Strategies
This section considers how effectively the instructor supports the pupil's learning.
It is not an assessment of whether one particular teaching technique has been used. Explanation, demonstration, instruction, questioning, coaching, practice and reflection can all have a place within client-centred learning. The relevant issue is whether the approach is appropriate for the pupil and supports useful learning.
10. Was the teaching and learning style suited to the pupil's learning style and current ability?
The wording of this competency refers to the pupil's ‘learning style’, but it should not be read as requiring an instructor to categorise somebody into a fixed type of learner. The wider DVSA guidance focuses on understanding the pupil, their current ability and how they respond to different approaches. This competency is therefore concerned with whether the way the instructor is working is suitable for the individual pupil at that point in their development, and whether the approach remains appropriate as circumstances change.
11. Was the pupil encouraged to analyse problems and take responsibility for their learning?
This considers the pupil's involvement in understanding their own learning. Rather than the instructor always identifying every problem and supplying every answer, the assessment considers the extent to which the pupil is involved in understanding situations, recognising development needs and taking responsibility for their learning. The amount of responsibility that is appropriate will depend on the pupil and the situation.
12. Were opportunities and examples used to clarify learning outcomes?
Real driving produces situations that can help connect practical experience with knowledge and understanding. This competency considers whether relevant opportunities and examples contribute to the pupil understanding what they are learning and why it matters. It is not simply about noticing events around the vehicle. The issue is whether an opportunity is relevant to the learning taking place and helps clarify it.
13. Was the technical information given comprehensive, appropriate and accurate?
Technical information needs to be correct, relevant to the situation and sufficient for the pupil's needs. An explanation can be factually correct but still be poorly suited to the situation if it is unnecessary, incomplete or provided at an unhelpful time. This competency therefore considers the quality and relevance of the technical information provided, not simply whether the instructor knows the subject.
14. Was the pupil given appropriate and timely feedback during the session?
Feedback helps the pupil understand their progress against the learning taking place. This includes recognising what is working as well as addressing areas requiring further development. The words appropriate and timely matter. Constant commentary is not automatically useful feedback, and feedback given too late may lose its connection with the event or learning point it relates to.
15. Were the pupil's queries followed up and answered?
A pupil needs to be able to seek clarification and develop their understanding. This competency considers whether questions or uncertainties are recognised and dealt with appropriately. A query does not always have to be answered immediately if doing so would be distracting or unsafe, but it should not simply be ignored. Queries may also be expressed through comments or uncertainty rather than a clearly phrased question.
16. Did the trainer maintain an appropriate non-discriminatory manner throughout the session?
This considers the professional learning environment created by the instructor. The pupil should be treated with respect and be able to participate in the lesson without discriminatory or inappropriate behaviour. The competency applies throughout the session and includes the instructor's behaviour towards the pupil and their attitude towards other road users.
17. At the end of the session – was the pupil encouraged to reflect on their own performance?
The final competency considers whether the pupil is involved in reviewing their own performance. Reflection is intended to help the pupil recognise progress and identify areas that may need further development. It is not simply about producing a score or answering a standard question at the end of every lesson. The instructor's assessment still matters. Pupil reflection does not require the instructor to agree with an inaccurate view of performance.
How are the 17 competencies scored?
Each competency receives a score from 0 to 3. DVSA describes the scoring as:
- 0 = No evidence of competence
- 1 = A few elements of competence demonstrated
- 2 = Competence demonstrated in most elements
- 3 = Competence demonstrated in all elements
Each of the 17 competencies can itself contain several elements. The score therefore reflects the evidence available across those elements.
A score of 3 does not mean that a particular behaviour was seen three times, and a score of 2 is not simply a general description meaning “quite good”.
The 17 scores are added together to give a maximum possible score of 51.
For Part 3, a total score of 31 to 42 is Grade B and 43 to 51 is Grade A. A score of 30 or below is a fail.
There is also an important Risk Management condition. A Part 3 candidate will fail regardless of the overall total if they score 7 or less in the Risk Management section. The test can also be failed if the candidate behaves in a way that creates immediate danger and the examiner has to stop the lesson.
Why do the competencies affect each other?
The competencies are scored separately, but the evidence behind them is often connected.
DVSA's examiner guidance specifically addresses consistency between scores. For example, if there has been no meaningful attempt to understand a pupil's learning goals and needs, it would be difficult to justify a high score for tailoring the lesson structure to those same needs.
The same principle can apply elsewhere.
Risk Management can affect Teaching & Learning Strategies. Understanding the pupil can affect Lesson Planning. Feedback can affect the pupil's understanding of risk. What happens in one part of a lesson may therefore provide evidence relevant to more than one competency.
This is one reason the 17 competencies make more sense when viewed as a framework rather than as a checklist.
Are the 17 competencies a teaching method?
No.
The 17 competencies provide a framework for assessing instructional ability. They do not prescribe one fixed method for teaching somebody to drive.
DVSA's National Standard for Driver and Rider Training describes client-centred learning as an integrated approach. It recognises legitimate roles for explanation and demonstration alongside approaches that encourage the learner to analyse, solve problems and take greater responsibility.
DVSA examiner guidance also makes clear that client-centred learning is not simply another name for coaching, and that coaching does not automatically replace direct instruction.
The appropriate approach depends on the pupil, the situation and what is being learned.
Understanding the competencies therefore should not lead to trying to manufacture 17 separate behaviours during a lesson.
Are the competencies different for Part 3 and Standards Checks?
The same 17 areas of competence are used for both the ADI Part 3 test and the ADI Standards Check.
The context is different.
Part 3 assesses the instructional ability of someone seeking to qualify as an approved driving instructor.
A Standards Check assesses a registered ADI's continuing ability to instruct.
In both cases, the examiner observes a client-centred driving lesson and assesses the evidence against the competency framework.
This is why understanding the competencies remains relevant after qualification. They are not only a Part 3 marking sheet.
Do you need to demonstrate all 17 competencies deliberately?
The competencies are all part of the assessment, but that does not mean a lesson should be constructed as 17 separate demonstrations for the examiner.
Some evidence may already exist through the natural course of the lesson. Some competencies are closely connected, and the relevance of particular behaviours will depend on what happens.
DVSA examiner guidance recognises this context. For example, an instructor may already know an existing pupil's learning goals from previous lessons. The examiner should take that into account rather than expecting the relationship to be artificially recreated at the start of the observed lesson.
The assessment is about the evidence of instructional competence within the lesson, not simply whether a sequence of expected phrases or behaviours has been performed.
Using the competencies for professional development
Although the competencies are used for formal assessment, they can also provide a useful structure for understanding areas of instructional practice.
A score or development need in one competency should not automatically be treated in isolation. Because the framework is interconnected, it can be useful to consider what sits behind the evidence and whether the same issue appears elsewhere.
Understanding the framework is the starting point.
Developing the knowledge, judgement and instructional skills behind it is a separate process that takes training, practice, reflection and feedback.
Where to go next
If you are preparing for the final qualifying test, read our ADI Part 3 guide for the test process, trainee licence options and what happens on the day.
If you want individual support with your instructional development, you can find an Instruct IQ trainer.
For wider PDI and ADI development, resources and community support, explore The PDI School.
Official information
The assessment framework and explanations on this page are based on current DVSA material, including:
- DVSA guidance for examiners carrying out ADI Part 3 tests and Standards Checks
- The National Standard for Driver and Rider Training
- GOV.UK guidance for the ADI Part 3 test
- GOV.UK guidance for the ADI Standards Check
Always use current GOV.UK and DVSA guidance when checking formal test or Standards Check requirements.
